Guardian sub critical of its own nuclear reaction

Today’s Guardian front page carried a stark headline:

Guardian homepage for March 16: Growing humanitarian crisis in nuclear drama overshadows disaster relief"

Disappointment loomed large for anyone breathing a sigh of relief at this astute observation, however, as clicking on the link led to an equally stark page…albeit one totally lacking in self-awareness: ‘Japan nuclear crisis—live updates’ it crows, pruriently.

This is the equivalent of writing:

This nuclear crisis is obscuring the suffering of the population because we, the media, keep saying how shit is blowing up, and there’s radioactive shit everywhere, and the water’s boiling, and it’s horrible, and oh my God it’s like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island and Windscale! It’s going nuclear and there’s shit everywhere! Shit!

Sitting alongside this trend for live-blogging panic is the desire for easy-to-understand graphical analyses:

Guardian's Fukushima Reactor Status graphic
And what could be better for displaying life, death, and potential catastrophe than a traffic light scale and jaunty fonts? We find it slightly odd that the Guardian only seems to class 4,277 dead as an orange-level catastrophe—though at least it merits more than Comic Sans. Or, our personal favourite font for lending gravitas to a natural disaster, Space Toaster:

4,277 dead, kids! written in the hilariously inappropriate font Space Toaster

And, just to make it extra-tasteful, the designer decided, as well as blasting our flagging empathy with incomprehensible numbers of fatalities, to quantify the disaster in units we can all understand: the performance of the Nikkei stock index. Do I want this page to update automatically every minute? Do I ever!

Written by Tom and Statto

March 16, 2011 at 23:32

Posted in metamedia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.